As a result of the files leaked by Snowden digital mass
surveillance is having an effect on journalism. Fundamental freedoms, under
government policies on preventing leaks and secrecy, are being threatened. This
undermines traditional values and is creating an effect on how the media is
allowed to cover such high-profile cases. For example when the Guardian
obtained files leaked by Snowden they were forced, under threat of action by
the UK government, to destroy hard drives containing the files. Another example
is when Glenn Greenwald’s former partner at the Guardian, David Miranda, was
held at a London airport for nine hours under the UK Terrorism Act. This was
solely based on Greenwald’s association with the Snowden case. These are prime
examples that have caused a distinct fear for journalists.
This fear comes from the uncertainty of being able to
protect their digital communications with sources as well. A red flag according
to, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Erich Schmitt, is when sources protect their digital
communication can actually attract more attention to their communications. If
this fear is instilled into sources then it is less likely that information
will reach the public. The same fear can be instilled into journalists who fear
breaking the law by accessing information through sources that practice civil
disobedience.
Journalism
as a result of the Snowden leaks has created a greater emphasis for free press.
In order to maintain a free society the press must remain free as well. With
this in mind stories need to matter and be more than just one story written
with facts. Those facts need to be questioned and researched further and
followed up on. Journalists have to have a willingness to make their stories
matter and be heard.
No comments:
Post a Comment